Natural Selection As We Speak
Via LanguageHat
Juliette Blevins
Evolutionary Phonology : The Emergence of Sound Patterns
Cambridge University Press, 2004

| G / 2005 (7) | February 18th, 2005 |
Natural Selection As We Speak
Shared
properties of human languages are not the result of universal grammar
but reflect self-organizing properties of language as an evolving system
The
forces of variation and selection which shape human language have
become issues of extensive research. Documentation of sounds and sound
patterns, and their evolution over the past 7000-8000 years allows
linguists to quantify the important role of human perception,
articulation and imperfect learning as language is passed from one
generation to the next. At this year’s AAAS conference in Washington,
DC, Juliette Blevins, senior scientist at the Max Planck Institute for
Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, presents a new approach to the
problem of how genetically unrelated languages across the world often
show similar sound patterns, without invoking innate mechanisms
specific to grammar. Languages as far apart as Native American,
Australian Aboriginal, Austronesian and Indo-European show similar
patterns of vowel and consonant inventory and distribution, but
exceptions to sound patterns regarded as universal show that these
similarities are best viewed as the result of convergent evolution.
|
A new model of sound change shows that evolutionary principles can account for striking phonetic similarities across unrelated languages, as well as the rarity of certain sounds. German and Russian are not the only languages in the world where sounds like b, d, and g lose their characteristic vocal fold ‘buzz’ at the end of the word. Dozens of unrelated languages, from Afar on the sands of Ethiopia, to Ingush in the northern Caucasus have similar sound patterns. Why are these patterns found in unrelated languages? Why do languages favour silent p t k sounds over noisy b d g Leave a Reply |