http://www.garyfeng.com/wordpress/2005/06/16/the-insignificance-of-statistical-signigicance-testing/ 如 影 随 行 Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:27:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2 http://www.garyfeng.com/wordpress/2005/06/16/the-insignificance-of-statistical-signigicance-testing/#comment-930 Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:40:12 +0000 http://www.garyfeng.com/wordpress/2005/06/16/the-insignificance-of-statistical-signigicance-testing/#comment-930 I just re-read the paper. I forgot how dense it is, but it does make a number of very useful points if you can plow through the rest. Sadly, these aren't new issues. I just re-read the paper. I forgot how dense it is, but it does make a number of very useful points if you can plow through the rest. Sadly, these aren’t new issues.

]]> http://www.garyfeng.com/wordpress/2005/06/16/the-insignificance-of-statistical-signigicance-testing/#comment-929 Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:23:32 +0000 http://www.garyfeng.com/wordpress/2005/06/16/the-insignificance-of-statistical-signigicance-testing/#comment-929 I think there is still nothing better on this topic than Paul Meehl's 1978 paper, which is available online here http://www.tc.umn.edu/~pemeehl/113TheoreticalRisks.pdf I think there is still nothing better on this topic than Paul Meehl’s 1978 paper, which is available online here http://www.tc.umn.edu/~pemeehl/113TheoreticalRisks.pdf

]]>