Morris Goldsmith: to count or to count on
Morris Goldsmith contrasts two approaches of assessing memory and recall — quantity-oriented vs. acuracy-oriented approaches. My favorite title: Memory as something that can be counted versus memory as something that can be counted on
Morris Goldsmith
More publications:
Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1994). Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 297-315.
Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517.
Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 483-531.
Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Weinberger-Eliezer, A. (2002). Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(1), 73-95.